![]() ![]() ![]() The LG G4 does well in the storage performance test. Values in KB/s - Higher is betterFile Size: 5, #Folders: 3, #Files/Folder: 1 Instead, it tends to use one or the other, with a heavy preference for the A53 cluster.įirst letter: S=sequential, R=randomSecond letter: R=read, W=write Due to thermal constraints, the 810 does not seem capable of using both the A53 and A57 clusters simultaneously. The Snapdragon 808 in the G4 keeps both A57 cores hovering around 1500MHz, but the M9 throttles back its A57 cores to essentially idle conditions. When the multi-core segment begins, both devices run their four A53 cores at the max rated frequency, but differ in how they utilize their A57 cores. Both devices leave the lower power A53 cores idle. During the brief single-core segment, the M9 keeps all four cores active but capped at 1536MHz compared to 1824MHz for the G4. The charts below compare the clock frequencies of the G4’s and M9’s A57 CPU cores during this test. In CoreMark-HPC, we see the G4’s Snapdragon 808 outperform the M9’s Snapdragon 810 in CPU performance once again. The G4 also scores well overall, although its inconsistent performance in the focused hardware tests hold it back, giving the G4 a slim 5% lead over the G3. Packing cutting-edge hardware, the Galaxy S6 leads the pack with the highest overall score. Will chopping off two of the power-hungry A57 cores be enough to keep temperature under control and give the G4 an advantage? How much faster is the G4’s 808 compared to the older Snapdragon 801 and 805 phones? ![]() On paper, Snapdragon 810’s two extra A57 cores and slightly faster A53 cores should give the HTC One M9 an advantage over the LG G4 in CPU performance however, because of the 810’s serious overheating issue, HTC must be very conservative in how the higher performing A57 cores are used. Snapdragon 805Qualcomm Krait 450 (4x 2.65GHz) That's a lot left to chance and is a gamble LG may do better to avoid.Snapdragon 810ARM Cortex-A57 (4x 1.96GHz) + ARM Cortex-A53 (4x 1.55GHz) If it's released in time for the holidays at a low price, the G Pad 5 may find a foothold in the market. It’s unclear what LG hopes to achieve with the G Pad 5 considering competitors like Samsung and Apple have superior tablets on the market. The lackluster specs make the G Pad 5 even more confusing. These specs put the G Pad 5 on the lower side of the mid-range for late 2019 and are, honestly, disappointing.Ĭonsidering LG’s last tablet, the G Pad 4, was released two years ago, and considering the trouble LG has had with its mobile division, it’s surprising to see a tablet from the Korean company, especially since the market for Android tablets has rapidly declined over the past few years. Other leaks claim the G Pad 5 will have a 10.1-inch 1920x1200 display, 3 GB of RAM, 32 GB of storage, and support for LTE. This design and the scores point to the Snapdragon 821, which is in line with earlier sightings. The final hardware has yet to be announced, but the Geekbench listing states the CPU is a Qualcomm quad-core chip clocked at 2.19 GHz. The tablet's scores are not impressive (347 single-core, 909 multi-core), competing with older smartphones like the OnePlus 3T and original Google Pixel. LG’s upcoming G Pad 5 was recently spotted on Geekbench under the model number LGE LM-T600. Too bad some of the new tablets are using old silicon. ![]() Android tablets are in heavy decline, but a few companies are still releasing new models. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |